Vegas Modern Weddings
  • Home
  • Packages
  • Wedding Resources
  • Contact
  • About/FAQs
  • Blog
  • Testimonials

The Aztec Humanist

2/1/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture

Picture
My cousin celebrated her wedding on November of 2019 in small town in México where she found a wonderfully rustic hacienda. She offered me the honor of officiating at her ceremony. 

My cousin also asked my aunt - well versed in the traditions of the Anahuac - to help her select several pre-hispanic ceremonial elements. Then my cousin asked us both to create a hybrid ceremony for her. 

I felt so happy being a part of this beautiful example of the strong bond among generations. 
​My cousin is a Polynesian dance instructor and she has been competing internationally for many years.

​These events are about more than just dancing so my cousin has become a very skilled costume designer. 

She made her own wedding bouquet. 

You may follow her on IG @jocymgs

Photography by Alfonso Flores.
0 Comments

GOD SAID SO

2/24/2016

0 Comments

 
As a response to violent attacks by religious fanatics, we have been hearing a lot of messages from religious moderates about how there should be no violence in the name of religion. As a humanist and an atheist, it does make me wonder about the mental exercise required to go from religious fanatic to religious moderate. I assume that for religious people, this may not be an easy task. As an atheist, recognizing that violence is wrong is simply a matter of common sense. As a believer, it involves defying  god's commands.
 
This is what I would like to understand: If you believe in a god and you follow instructions from a religious text, how do you justify ignoring the rules where your god demands violence?
 
For example: Let's assume that today is September 10th, 2001 and you have been given 24 hours to talk to one of the terrorists getting ready to fly a plane into the World Trade Center.  Do you believe you could convince this man to change his mind? How do you prove to someone that their actions are immoral if they tell you that they are doing it because “God said so"?
 
It seems to me that it is much easier for atheists to be peaceful because we are not burdened by the inflexibility of violent religious texts. It is ironic that atheists are criticized for not following an absolute moral code, while we see religious moderates who avoid becoming fanatics by applying moral relativism to their texts and tempering their fanaticism with humanism. It turns out that religious moderates are good, not because of the rules they follow but because of the rules they choose to ignore.
 
I would like to hear from religious moderates; people that still believe in a god, but would never use religion to justify violence. How do you do justify reading the Bible or the Quran and ignoring some parts? 
 
This is an important question because even though many members of our religious community would never use religion to justify violence, they still feel morally justified in using religion to discriminate against women and homosexuals. Humanists and atheists don't understand why some people still belong to religious organizations which condemn same-sex marriage. The fact that women still belong to religious institutions which do not treat them as equals is incomprehensible to us. This is why we need help understanding how to best combat religious violence, religious bigotry and religious hate.
 
How can atheists help our religious brothers and sisters improve their moral character? We would like to know how to respond to someone who justifies their actions by saying: "God said so."
0 Comments

MAWWIAGE

9/17/2014

1 Comment

 
(This entry was written by my wife, Leilani. Thanks, babe!)

What is marriage? Two people in a committed, binding relationship? Sure. Well, this is what I learned from The Princess Bride at the ripe young age of 12.

“Mawwiage, that bwessed awwangement, that dweam within a dweam… And wove, twue wove, wiww fowwow you fowevah and evah… So tweasuwe youw wove…”

What a glorious description! Fast forward to 2005. I had just gone through a divorce – a supremely difficult, painful, and eye-opening period for me. I started seeing a co-worker (GASP!) and I thought that this was TWUE WOVE. Perhaps I was in the rebound stage. Perhaps it was destiny. Whatever it was, we soon headed down the path of relationship discovery.

We began discovering all sorts of quirky bits about each other. One particular discovery (i.e. argument) during that stage was the great “Princess Bride” debate. We were “getting to know each other” and my paramour asked me to name my Top 10 Movies. I thought about it carefully and named off the following:

The English Patient

Good Fellas

These first two were greeted with an agreeing nod.

Trading Places

This received an “it’s okay, I guess” flipping of the hand.

The Princess Bride

Wait, what? The convo came to a screeching halt. My husband-to-be looked at me quizzically – The Princess Bride??!? ! Then the argument ensued. I extolled the virtues of this movie, quoting various scenes, and ended with “Come on! How can you not agree with this choice?” This was a very passionate discussion, perhaps because we were in the beginnings of a relationship and it was novel to argue about movies.  He agreed that it was a good movie – but no way did it deserve to be listed in someone’s Top 10. Honestly I can’t remember how it ended. I believe Raul just kept pushing the point because he enjoyed seeing me get angrier and angrier…and then he may have finally conceded, with a well-played “I guess it’s okay, it’s your decision after all”, both placating and insulting me at the same time. We didn’t get to finish the list. But I discovered (and continue to discover) something from that night. That Raul is insufferable during an argument? No, I already knew that. What I discovered is that it’s okay to disagree. And to discuss why you feel a particular way – without having to get defensive.

I don’t remember Raul’s list (good wife, eh?). Maybe we didn’t even get to them, because we were so wrapped up in the PB discussion. Raul still doesn’t understand my love for that film. But that’s okay. I still WOVE him.

1 Comment

Humanist Wedding

5/12/2014

0 Comments

 

Ceremonies are important for several reasons: they serve as rites of passage; they mark events of transition; they allow us to announce important events to our community; and by sharing them with others, they help us make these moments more memorable. 

Ceremonies are how we recognize the most transcendental moments in our lives.

Births, graduations, weddings and funerals – all important moments in life that have been traditionally solemnized with ceremonies. But just because it’s a tradition to have a ceremony around these events doesn’t mean that the ceremony itself can’t change.  In some cases, changing the traditional ceremony is highly recommended. For example:

Good funeral tradition: Spreading the ashes of the deceased.
Bad funeral tradition: When the widow throws herself onto the husband's funeral pyre (Indian tradition called Sati – still performed in the XXI century).

Good birth tradition: Naming a baby.
Bad birth tradition: When we cut off the clitoris of a baby girl (tradition practiced in Africa and the Middle East– still performed in the XXI century).
Another bad birth tradition: When the Mohel cuts off a baby boy’s foreskin and sucks the blood with his mouth (Jewish tradition called Metzitzah - still performed in the XXI century in the U.S.A.).


Good wedding tradition: Exchanging of rings by a couple as a symbol of permanent commitment.
Bad wedding tradition: Having the bride vow to “love, honor and OBEY” her husband (Catholic tradition – has mostly evolved into “love, honor and CHERISH”).

So while humanists recognize the importance of maintaining the tradition of a ceremony, we don’t apply the same rigidity to the ceremony itself. By allowing some flexibility into our own ceremonies, we are able to get rid of the bad, improve on the good, and create celebrations that are more personal and much more meaningful to everyone involved. Plus, we believe changing traditions is good because it allows our ceremonies to evolve with the times.

Babies may not have much to say about how we welcome them into this world. Regarding our own funeral, all we can really do is trust that our last wishes will be honored after we’re gone. But there is one ceremony of which we have full control: our wedding. The ceremony that celebrates the love and the union of two people should be a reflection of the needs and wants of those two individuals. That is why many people today recognize that a personalized ceremony is much more significant than the cookie-cutter kind. It is for this reason (and thanks to ceremonial flexibility), that we are able to maintain the tradition (having a wedding) while creating a whole new tradition at the same time (everyone in the wedding party is dressed as a character from “The Wizard of Oz” or “Game of Thrones").

We should not forget that a wedding is more than a union of two people – it is the coming together of two families so you know you can expect many different views and philosophies.

For some couples, it is very important not to offend anyone. For others, it is very important to send a clear message to both their families that proudly states: “This is who we are, and we are proud of who we are. Please respect us and accept us as we are.”

These two conflicting priorities are responsible for shaping the two main types of non-religious weddings today. The “Full Out” and the “Stealth”.

Full Out: The couple is open about their non-belief and the whole wedding party knows it. The couple’s lack of belief is the central part of the ceremony and there is great pride in this fact. We rejoice in the fact that a human union can be celebrated without the aid of the supernatural and for many, a wedding is the perfect time to make this statement.

Stealth: The couple may or may not be open about their non-belief to their family and friends so this is not mentioned during the ceremony. The goal is to have a non-religious ceremony but have no one notice. This is usually done to prevent the discomfort of older relatives – no one wants to start an argument with their uncle or give grandma a heart attack on their wedding day!

The stealth wedding is preferred as a means of maintaining harmony on a day when we celebrate human love and commitment. As a humanist, I believe this is where the true value of the wedding ceremony resides.

It may be tempting, especially for young couples, to have the kind of ceremony that their family expects them to have. That's why today, there are still couples that get married in a church they hardly ever visit; couples that have a religious wedding in order to appease religious relatives; church weddings for couples that disagree with the religious views of the church (e.g. unequal treatment of women; prejudice towards homosexuals; condemnation of pre-marital sex and/or birth control).


As a humanist, I believe that if you no longer agree with the rules dictated by a particular religious institution, you should not celebrate your wedding in a church just to maintain appearances. If you do, you could be setting a bad precedent that may haunt you for the rest of your life. If you can't show courage and conviction on your own wedding day, then when? If there ever was a time to make a bold statement about who you are as a couple, this should be it.

0 Comments

Humanist Funeral

2/11/2014

2 Comments

 
A friend of mine passed away in December of 2013. She was a proud humanist so she had come out of the atheist closet when she was much younger. Her family understood and accepted her philosophy, so even though most of them were members of the LDS Church (aka Mormons), they honored her wishes of having a humanist funeral. The service was simple but very touching and it was officiated by a Humanist Celebrant friend of mine. Present were members of her family, most of whom traveled all the way from Texas to attend. Also present were her humanist and atheist friends - members of the Las Vegas secular community.

If you have never been to a humanist funeral, it may help to understand that we don’t believe in an afterlife. The focus of the service is on what happened during the person’s life instead of what will happen after their death. For a humanist, immortality is achieved through our good deeds; transcendence is attained through the actions we take and the impact those actions may have in other people’s lives, sometimes long after we’re gone. This is what gives sense and meaning to our lives.

Several family members spoke at her service and we all found comfort in our shared love for her. Most of the speakers had something nice to say about tolerance and acceptance - they recalled candid conversations they had with her about god and religion and they admitted how much they respected the strength of her convictions. They acknowledged the fact that despite our different belief systems, we are still humans that share the same human emotions and can come together to celebrate that which unites us and put aside what divides us.

Close to the end of the service, my friend’s sister stepped up to the podium to share with us something that had happened during the last days of her life.  My friend had suffered a stroke and was in the hospital for over a week before passing. During that time, she couldn't communicate very well but she could respond to simple questions. One day, her sister asked her if she was aware that at one point after surgery, her heart had stopped. My friend shook her head to say “no”. Her sister then asked if during that time she had seen her room and her body from above. My friend nodded “yes”. Her sister then got really excited as she asked: “Do you believe now?” To which my friend replied by shaking her head with an emphatic “NO”. The sister then told us that someone had already tried to explain to her why some people have these out-of-body experiences. Then she said: “I was never as smart as my sister so I can’t understand all this stuff about brain synapses and whatnot, but I know for fact that one day I will see my Lord and Savior. I know that when I die I will stand in front of my God and the angels and I also know that I will see my sister again. And when I see her, I will finally get to say to her ‘I told you so.’” 

All the Mormons laughed at that idea while the rest of us remained silent and feeling quite uncomfortable. The service ended on that awful note and we said our goodbyes – the Mormons feeling satisfied and the atheists feeling quite the opposite. I’m still amazed at how some people of faith miss the irony of admitting absolute ignorance while claiming absolute knowledge in the same sentence.

I still regret not speaking up that day. I keep telling myself that this was their family member, not mine, and they should be allowed to mourn and deal with her death in their own way. But sometimes I lay awake at night and I think of what I would have said had I had the courage to stand up and speak after my friend’s sister. As I lay in bed I imagine myself slowly walking towards the podium with a smirk on my face as I look at my friend’s picture. I turn to look at her family and to her sister I say: “I hope you are right. I really do. Because if you are wrong and you have chosen the wrong religion, or the wrong god, or the wrong set of rules to follow, you may find yourself at the end of your life waking up in hell. But that’s OK because that’s probably where all of us will also be and then you will get to see your sister again! And when you do, please explain to her why, even though you were well aware of the fact that she spent most of her life advocating for equality and respect for a secular view of the world, you still felt that her funeral was the appropriate venue for you to have the last word.”

I’m proud of myself for keeping my mouth shut that day.

I also like to imagine that if I had spoken up, my friend would have been proud of me.



2 Comments

    Author

    Raúl Martínez is a proud secular humanist and part-time comedian from Las Vegas. Born in Mexico City, he moved to the United States in 1996 and became a citizen in May of 2001. He was a member of the Board of Directors of the American Humanist Association from January 2009 to December 2014. In 2011, he became one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Nevada for the right of atheists to perform marriages - this after having his application denied twice by the County Clerk for not being a member of a religious organization.

    Archives

    February 2020
    February 2016
    September 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014

HOME     |     PACKAGES     |     RESOURCES     |     ABOUT     |     CONTACT    |    BLOG    |    TESTIMONIALS 


2013 © All Rights Reserved
Web Design by Krevich Consulting